翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Self-service software vendors
・ Self-serving bias
・ Self-shadowing
・ Self-shrinking generator
・ Self-signed certificate
・ Self-similar process
・ Self-similarity
・ Self-similarity matrix
・ Self-Similarity of Network Data Analysis
・ Self-siphoning beads
・ Self-stabilization
・ Self-steering gear
・ Self-stereotyping
・ Self-storage box
・ Self-Strengthening Movement
Self-styled orders
・ Self-sufficiency
・ Self-Sufficiency Project
・ Self-surgery
・ Self-sustainability
・ Self-synchronizing code
・ Self-tapping screw
・ Self-Taught Learner
・ Self-taxation
・ Self-testing code
・ Self-tiling tile set
・ Self-titled (disambiguation)
・ Self-Titled (Zao album)
・ Self-titled Album (The Audition album)
・ Self-titled Album (The Huntingtons album)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Self-styled orders : ウィキペディア英語版
Self-styled orders

Pseudo-chivalric orders or self-styled orders are organizations which claim to be chivalric orders, but are not recognised as legitimate by countries or international bodies. Most self-styled orders arose in or after the mid-eighteenth century and many have been created recently. Most are short-lived and endure no more than a few decades.
==Recognition of orders as genuine==
Many countries do not regulate the wearing of decorations, and remain neutral as to whether any particular order is legitimate or not.
Other countries explicitly regulate what decorations are accepted as legitimate. The criteria of France provide an illustrative example of those nations which take a more regulatory approach: Only decorations recognised by the Chancery of the Legion of Honour may be worn publicly, and permission must be sought and granted to wear any foreign awards or decorations. Dynastic orders are prohibited unless the dynasty in question is currently recognised as sovereign. (For example, the Royal Victorian Order is explicitly recognised, whereas the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus is not.〔) Failure to comply is punishable by law. A non-exhaustive list of collectively authorised orders is published by the French government.〔http://www.drimm.fr/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=75&Itemid=45〕 Other examples include the United Kingdom, where legitimacy of any particular order is determined by the Monarch - some societies have permission from the Monarch to award medals, but these are to be worn on the right side of the chest. No UK citizen may accept and wear a foreign award without the Sovereign's permission, moreover, the government is explicit that permission for foreign awards conferred by private societies or institutions will not be granted. In Sweden, decisions about medals and orders worn on a military uniform has been delegated to the General Staff.
The (International Commission for Orders of Chivalry ) (ICOC) also maintains a set of principles to evaluate whether a chivalric order is genuine. The ICOC is not officially recognised by any international treaty, and their definition is explicitly rejected by many countries (see examples above of France, UK, and Sweden). The ICOC was created as a temporary committee of the International Congress of Genealogical and Heraldic Sciences in August 1960, though it has been transformed into a permanent and independent international body. The ICOC argues that a chivalric order must have a fount of honour (or ''fons honorum'') as either its founder or its principal patron in order to be considered genuine. A fount of honour is a person who held sovereignty either at or before the moment when the order was established. The ICOC considers that holding sovereignty before the founding of an order is considered effective in creation of a genuine chivalric order only if the former sovereign had not abdicated his sovereignty before the foundation of the order but, instead, had been deposed or had otherwise lost power. In the ICOC's view, some organisations create a false ''fons honorum'' in order to satisfy this requirement and give themselves apparent legitimacy; often, the founder or patron of a self-styled order has assumed a false title of nobility as well as supposed current or former sovereignty. The ICOC maintains a (list ) of which organizations they consider to be genuine chivalric orders.
Certain organisations which may appear to have a chivalric character (such as the Augustan Society and the International Fellowship of Chivalry-Now, which state publicly that they are not chivalric orders), carefully distinguish themselves from self-styled orders of chivalry, orders legitimized by countries, and those viewed as genuine by international bodies.
After the medieval era, the exclusive right to confer nobility, titles, knighthoods and membership in Europe's state-recognized orders of chivalry was arrogated by sovereigns, exceptions being recorded in such annals as the ''Almanach de Gotha'' for Dynastic orders granted by royal consorts (e.g., Order of the Starry Cross) or pretenders.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Self-styled orders」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.